I thought electric shock therapy was a
thing of the past, a bizarre—albeit effective, in some
cases—treatment for severe depression and bipolar disorder, so I
was surprised to find that there is a school in Canton, Massachusetts
that still uses electric shock therapy, also called electroconvulsive
therapy (ECT). But this school does not use ECT to treat depression
or bipolar disorder. Rather, it uses this treatment to address
behavioral problems in kids and adults who have developmental
disabilities.
Various types of electric therapy have
been around as early as the 16th century, but ECT—the
only form of shock therapy used in modern medicine—didn't become
widespread in the UK and US until the 1940s and -50s. Today it is
estimated that about 1 million people worldwide receive ECT every
year, usually in a course of 6–12 treatments administered 2 or 3
times a week.
There is, of course, a lot of
controversy regarding the effectiveness and validity of ECT. For one,
reports of ECT's effectiveness are only documented in the short term.
That is, the treatment may be effective, but only for one to six
months, and research psychiatrist Colin A. Ross found that there was
no single study that showed a significant difference between real and
placebo ECT at one month post-treatment. Furthermore, most ECT
research is done with the effectiveness of depression and bipolar
disorder treatment, not behavioral problems among the developmentally
disabled. So why is ECT being used in that setting?
As is turns out, parents have found ECT
to be very helpful in treating their children. Last year, NBC New
York published a story about Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, that
school in Massachusetts that uses ECT on its students, and explained
that while the facility gets a lot of negative feedback in response
to its methods, many parents continue to show their support:
“In 2006, the parents of Samantha Shear told NBC New York they were desperate after their daughter couldn’t stop hurting herself by hitting herself in the eyes. The Shear family insists skin shock therapy was a last resort that improved their daughter’s life.
'The thought process is, “we need something severe enough to make this kid stop hurting herself,”' said Marcia Shear. 'And you know something, it worked.'”
However, many people find ECT to be an
inhumane, torturous method of treatment. A video of Rotenberg
released in 2002 shows a patient, Andre McCollins, tied to a mat,
receiving more than 30 electric shocks, each lasting two seconds. In
2006, another student, Antwone Nicholson withdrew from the school
after receiving similar treatment. Though she did sign consent forms,
Antwone's mother, Evelyn Nicholson, claimed that the extent of the
shocking and the potential for abuse were never disclosed.
Now Rotenberg is back in the spotlight.
In a legal filing last week, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha
Coakley moved to end a court order that has limited the state’s
regulatory authority of the Rotenberg center since the 1980s. The
state aims to get broader authority over the facility and insists
that ECT is an unacceptable method of treatment for individuals with
intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Naturally, I hope the state wins. What
do you think? Do you have any experience with electroconvulsive
therapy?